SO let me get this straight:
This guy ANthony has a my space page with the BarackObama name.. thats IT! something that takes 2 minutes to do.. then people want to be BarackObama's friend so he accepts them by clicking accept 160,000 times over a few months
THAT IS IT FOLKS!
and for that he should be paid?
its a standard myspace program...he did not web design or anything of the sort
he reminds me of trippi .. when dean started losing trippi bailed out slamming the door... then he thought the deaniacs would follow him.. no one did
this guy Anthony has a lot of nerve trying to trade on someone else's name and make money of it
i don't understand how anyone could think obama is not entitled to his myspace domain or why he should have to pay anthony one dime..
myspace is a community not a money making venture..
i just signed up as obama's friend for the first time..
i guess the campaign made a mistake in paying for the haircuts after all.. or maybe they are trying to do some damage control considering the bad pr..either way john edwards will end up paying for the haircuts and not his campaign contributors...
not sure if this was the best way to handle this.. i liked someone's suggestion on this very site that he shave his hair for charity!
here's the link to the ap article by my nemesis nedra pickler
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id= D8OJOO2O0&show_article=1
wow! pretty sweet! a real man of the people.. a real progressive there! glad i didn't contribute to this campaign.... how can anyone justify spending 400 bucks on a haircut is beyond me
the most i ever paid for a haircut was about $30...i was pretty happy with it...
lately i don't get haircuts so i look like a rockstar i'm told.. within 24 hours i was told "has anyone ever told you that you like like keith richards.." and "you look a lot like mick jagger".... late last week someone told me i looked like bob dylan..
I read that France's elections for President officially kicked off yesterday and the first round is set for April 21 and the second for May 5 assuming no candidate obtains 50% and it got me thinking. What do we gain in the US by having this extremely protracted electoral process? Also in France during the electoral calendar the television channels give equal access to the different candidates. As far as I understand it money plays a really minor role in their process. I cannot understand why we need so much time and money to have our elections. We must be the only country in the world that does it this way and what do we gain from it?
· Blanche Lincoln's website supports public option (desmoinesdem)
· Big Coal's PR Spending Spree (desmoinesdem)
· IA-03: Former college wrestling coach to challenge Boswell (desmoinesdem)
· Tea Baggers Target Gore... (Cliff Schecter)
· Stimulus Watch (Jerome Armstrong)
· CREW seeks ethics inquiry of Bachmann (desmoinesdem)
· Did IRC help? (MN Campaign Report)
· 5 Worst cities for urban youth (desmoinesdem)
· "The Bishops' Huge Financial Stake in Stupak-Pitts" (desmoinesdem)
· Conservative group wants FEC to override state laws on robocalls (desmoinesdem)
· URGENT: Call these House Ds Saturday to oppose Stupak amendment (desmoinesdem)
· WI-08: Wingnut plans to run as "conservative independent" (desmoinesdem)